What’s in a Smile? Politicizing Disability through Selfies and Affect (7/50)

This article focuses on selfies and empowerment of individuals with physical disabilities. By exploring the #FSHDselfies campaign as a case study, I discuss the role affect plays in mediated advocacy for the representation of non-normative bodies, allowing disabled individuals to gather as a community and disrupt contemporary beauty standards. I draw on the case study to re-articulate the term “community of affect” (Climo, 2001) as the socio-political structure that promotes marginalized groups’ negotiation of collective identity and communal action geared towards cultural, social, and political change. This community can be seen as a sub-section or a specific discursive space categorized under “affective publics” (Papacharissi, 2014). I show in this context how participatory forms of representation open a space for negotiation and criticism of marginalized groups on the one hand, while oversimplifying the complex and diverse lives of minority groups on the other hand.

What do you think?

Written by William Schmitt

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Loading…

0

Deaf and Hard of Hearing Smartphone Users: Intersectionality and the Penetration of Ableist Communication Norms (1/50)

Platform-swinging in a poly-social-media context: How and why users navigate multiple social media platforms (8/50)